Scarpa’s New Telemark Boot Program?

There’s been a lot of tele innovation lately, but it’s all been in the world of tele traps, those contraptions called bindings linking your boot to the ski while adding a bit of flavor to the flex. They are an intrinsic ingredient to the telemark turn. And there has been a lot change in the last seven years, all of it in the province of the New Telemark Norm.

It is past due time for the boot makers to step up and refine their side of the equation. Lately that refinement has been limited to pruning models that are withering on the vine or cutting features that represent a liability. Not exactly a picture of innovation, but one of retreat. Scott Sports did step up and add tech inserts to their NTN Voodoo, but only at the toe — the “Achilles insert” will not be included.

It’s enough to give a telemarker heartburn, yet hope springs eternal.

Since the dawn of the Terminator, Scarpa has been a leader in telemark boot development. Even before the Terminator, Scarpa’s Tele Sauvage was as mean as leather could get, except it wasn’t mean enough.

The limit of what is possible with a duckbilled system has been achieved and it has two insurmountable limits. The first is the ability to provide a reliable, non-plate release system. Nobody has come up with a way to do it, or hadn’t until the duckbill was castrated for NTN. The other issue, affecting tele mountaineers only, is compatibility with alpine crampons. It’s too small of a market to make crampon toe bails for duckbills. Though elegant for initiating flex, the ugly duckbill has consequences.

A few years back Kim Miller, president of Scarpa USA told me, “we want to make a new tele boot, but we want the bindings to settle down a bit. There’s a lot of change going on now.”

The original NTN system – Terminator X with Freeride binding.

In a conversation with him before Christmas 2016 he reminded me the two paths of development were his fault, but not his intention. The basic NTN concept of clamping a boot between the toe and mid-foot was executed pretty well by Rottefella’s Freeride. Until they licensed the patent to 22 Designs, there wasn’t much variation to the concept, no new ideas. Even today, there are only three models of a “pure” NTN binding: Freedom, Freeride, and Outlaw.

However, there is another type of binding that NTN boots can work with, provided they are outfitted with inserts. With Dynafit inserts the boot can be held at the toe with a 2-pin tech binding. Known generically as telemark tech bindings, the Telemark Tech System was first tested, then patented in the US by Mark Lengel. It’s about a simple as it gets, and light to boot. Unbelievably, because those puny two pins at the toe can’t possible be strong enough, it skis as solid as a Hammerhead and tours like a Dynafit.

The presence of those inserts is where Kim Miller becomes culpable. As he told me, “those were a purely selfish feature we included just so I could use one boot to ski alpine or tele.”

But that opened the door to more than one way to connect to the boot, in a way only Fritz Barthel, the genius behind Dynafit, had ever bothered to conceive of. Fritz isn’t a telemarker, so why would he bother to purse that idea. But OMG’s Mark Lengel was. And Pierre Mouyade, as a new tele convert and a mechanical engineer couldn’t help but notice telemark bindings needed some help. He saw the value of the tech toe and the second heel connection of NTN so he merged them with the Meidjo binding.

When Outlaw came out the same year as Meidjo, and do-it-yourselfers began cobbling their own TTS together, Kim Miller could see binding designs converging and that was the signal to get back to work on a new boot. Or, as he mentioned last January in a meeting with Scarpa’s Italian design team, “we don’t just want to build a new boot, we’re looking at a new line of tele boots with features and capabilities that set a new threshold.”

Kim Miller, president of Scarpa USA and the author near Loveland Pass.

Traditionally such a goal is done behind closed doors, to stay a step ahead of the competition. However, it is apparent none of the other players are interested in doing anything other than milking the molds they have while they can. Besides, it’s not the same world it was twenty years ago. While there is a lot of noise on the world wide web, there are also nuggets of information worth harvesting. Scarpa wants to leverage that as they embark upon developing the next generation of telemark boots. They know from experience good design can do more than just improve the performance of their products, it can provoke competition and help fuel growth of the sport.

It isn’t like the key features the tele tribe wants aren’t already on Scarpa’s list of design goals. Things like lighter weight and more cuff mobility seem obvious. What else have you been dreaming of? It’s the internet, tell us what you think below, at, on’s FB page,’s FB page, and/or submit your ideas in the attached survey.


© 2017

113 thoughts on “Scarpa’s New Telemark Boot Program?

  1. I have shorter legs with bigger calves and don’t develop as much leverage for flexing the cuffs. I have to buy the stiffest boots to get the stiffest bellows and that means a high 4 buckle stiff cuff which doesn’t fit my calves and doesn’t initiate or flex until the bellows which are never stiff enough. So… much, much stiffer bellows on a more flexible cuff, 3 buckle boot would be my suggestion for what it’s worth, which is nothing.

  2. I too would immediately buy a touring oriented NTN boot with tech inserts for the Meidjo, which I consider to be the future of telemark. I don’t understand the move toward stiffer boot bellows; the bindings can supply the stiffness and make it adjustable, and a soft bellows helps keep your rear forefoot on the ski, instead of pivoting on the toe. 3 buckles seems appropriate. Wider forefoot but narrow heel like the recent Hoji AT boot from Dynafit seems to fit more people well. Lots of cuff range of motion, especially forward. Not crazy stiff in downhill mode. I ski my TXs with the top buckle loose unless I know I’ll be parallel turning on ice.
    Telemark is about fluid motion, not hard-charging stiffness. I think the industry lost their way when tele was cool and alpine skiers switched over in droves, but wanted to ski like they were on alpine gear. Why not ski alpine gear then? If we can get a soft, smooth, light, supportive, medium height touring boot to go with the excellent bindings now available, I think telemark will come alive again.

  3. The lack of a backcountry-focused boot for the next gen bindings seems the biggest market gap at the moment. I agree with previous posters. A majority of reviewers now seem to agree that Dynafit/NTN bindings (Meijdo, and Lynx, eventually) are the dog’s bollocks. I’ve got no reason to doubt them. But that leaves someone looking for a BC-centric setup in the pickles. If I splash out for a Meijdo/Lynx now I’m stuck with a resort focused, heavy, stiff boot again (not ideal). If I’m lucky enough I might be able to find an old T2/T3 AT boot, which allegedly works well for telemarking, but then I have to go down the TTS path (which is great for touring, I’m sure), but less polyvalent, and arguably less future proof. So while we might be very close to the ideal binding, boot (non-)availability still drives our binding choices.

  4. What I want is a retrofuture NTN leather carbon fiber mash-up frankenboot! 100+ comments. This topic has obviously struck a nerve. Also a crazy idea I keep thinking of… removable cuffs©. Has anyone explored this? Think NNN-BC level touring and then slap on some stiff cuff uppers and (bam!) downhill performance. Just part of the typical transition, ripping skins, etc.

  5. A 3-pin leather boot that brings back some feel to really riding a ski; yet, still supports the ankle enough to drive skis 88mm-100mm in width. Modern plastic just doesn’t flex well enough…same old argument that was ignored years ago; yet, I’ve tried all the plastics and bindings and they just don’t compare. Leather lasts so much longer too and nothing beats the simplicity, functionality, and light weight of the 3 pin cable binding (for telemarking). Ever wonder why the 3-pin binding remains the longest running binding design in skiing? How about a boot to match that superiority in binding simplicity, reliability, and functionality that has largely been forgotten in the pursuit of the dollar?

  6. I use Scarpa boots because I have narrow feet yet the new NTN boots are wider than my duck bill T-Races. I hope the new models can offer a similar fit to my current boots.

  7. Love my Scarpa TX Pro. Fit well. Great for resort or BC. Using with Freedom. Very strong and reliable boot binding combo.

  8. Thanks for the opportunity to provide feedback.

    I love my Scarpa TX Pros (black/orange version) – they are the most comfortable boot I’ve ever owned, and give great ski control.
    I have wide feet, and after a painful season in Garmont Prophets I switched to the TX Pros and now have pain-free skiing. No forefoot pinch or toe crushing. The liner is fine and my feet have stayed dry. The only issue I’ve had is losing the screw twice from the shell’s tongue. It seems the movement of the tongue tends to undo the screw.

    My request though is for a new boot for fixed (pivot-less) binding back country pattern-ski touring, which I also do. Those of us who live where the terrain is undulating and lower-angle are not really catered for by the free-pivot-skin-up then lock-the-binding-ski-down in super stiff boots arrangement. What is needed, in my view, is a boot with a +soft+ bellows, three buckles, and, given the available bindings, a duckbill toe. The closest is perhaps the T2 Eco but that has extremely stiff bellows. A soft bellows would not only allow comfortable striding and gentle climbing (without using a free pivot), but also enable good forefoot contact for the back foot during a tele turn, akin to using an old leather boot. There are the Scott/Garmont Excursion and the Scarpa T4, but these, being lower, don’t give enough ski control, and also, due to the lack of a (Q-link) midstrap buckle at the ankle, tend to cause blisters due to excessive foot movement. So how about a Scarpa T3 (or T4) Eco with forefoot, ankle and calf buckles, 102mm last, soft bellows and a duckbill?

  9. On March 23d Mr Miller made some interesting comments for Snowsports Industries America. Key to me was this paragraph:

    Q: Telemark…help us out here, why no new boots or bindings?

    A: We do not make new products just to sell more stuff. There needs to be real innovation and advancement here and that takes time and a lot of money. This is always the challenge. If you know about what it takes to make a new plastic tele boot (costs for tooling) and you compare that to the size of the market, it is pretty clear why this is a big challenge and effort to do the right thing here. We / I have so much passion for Telemark and it is clear that AT has hurt tele not because of the turn but the efficiency of the boots compared to AT boots.

    A: We are trying and want this so much but passion alone will not pay the costs to do this. We have been developing and testing new prototypes for the last two years but this needs to be a real advancement and not just a commercial endeavor.


    Any views?

  10. to me Scarpa’s ntn fit is to wide, to voluminous. Others complain it is not wide enough.
    consider offering different fits:
    a narrow last, low volume fit vs. a wider and high volume fit

  11. 75mm. Smartness in details. Fresh cool design & colors (not carbon-ish like rando race). More options for even more agressive cuff angel. Light weight. Warm and dry.

  12. Hi there,

    After 8 or so years on Scarpa T2 Eco + Black Diamond O1 + Scottybob, I am ready for new equipment. All three have worn out.
    I am happy with all pieces of equipment, and ready for the next round.
    Most likely I will again buy Scarpas as they fit my feet better than other brands like Crispi.

    As from now I will simply have to wait for that new Scarpa boot (pretty light/stiff, ntn + tech inserts fit for both telemark and touring, provided those smart binding manufacturers put a stiff plate underneath the front plate of the shoe to avoid bowing of the front nose when touring).
    I expect to use the shoe for both light and heavy work. I will need two sets:
    Set 1: Touring + off-piste, something like 22 designs lynx on 180cm Scottybob 130-95-120.
    Set 2: On-piste tele-carving, something like 22 desings Outlaw X on Mantra/Kendo/Bonafide.
    Stronger, Here is my order for a pair. Size 28.5 or 29.0. Would you please be so kind to keep the price point below EUR 475?

    Does that help?

  13. Scarpa T4 older model liner(2015) with a additional removeable upper cuff extension which will convert them into same height as the T1/T2.
    The “do it all” pinhead boots!

  14. I am right now looking to spend $550 on anew pair of Scott Synergy boots, yes with the duckbill, coz i love my Voile 3 pin CRB hardwires and won’t ski with anything else.

    i did use a T2 in the past, also later a nice pair of T1s, but my foot only feels good in the wider Garmont last boot.

    I would absolutely consider a Scarpa boot if the width was wider. A choice of a wider 3 and a 4 buckle boot would be nice also.

    pretty much only used inbounds, so i don’t consider weight that much.

  15. I’ve been skiing telemark since 1983. I’ve been part of the evolution in gear, hungry for better gear always. When NTN came out I bought in immediately. Perhaps too fast. Used Freerides with 2nd gen yellow/black TX Pros. Liking the step-in and heel hold-down, but very much not liking the tippy-toe flex pattern, I jumped when Meidjo 2.0 came out. And matched with the earlier TX Pros, I also bought the M-Designs tech heel. Two problems transpired quickly. 1st the tech heel, while a great idea, is weak and the part of the body of the binding keeping the locking pin for the prongs broke day one. A week later I pulled the aft part of the Meidjo’s fwd binding mount from the ski, a common problem in that design. And so I transitioned to the Outlaw. Worried that Scarpa might join other MFGs and pull the NTN boot I bought 2016 TX Pros. No offense, but I only used them once and now they collect dust. The problem was serious bellows collapse that not only skied poorly, but also pinched my toes. Scarpa 2nd Gen TX Pros were a far better boot. What happened?

    Now I’m back on old Garmont Garas using VICE and AXLE bindings, and I’ll stay on them until 3 things happen.

    1st: Someone, whether it is Pierre at M-Equipment or otherwise we need a beefier Dynafit level of quality tele tech binding based on the Meidjo’s design qualities; i.e flex pattern and tech toe. The Meidjo is close to a perfect skiing NTN; far better IMO than Freerides and even Outlaws, and it seems the wave of the future.

    2nd: If M-Equipments tech heel was improved to Dynafit Speed Radical durability. The tech heel is a critical feature IMO that would draw a lot of AT skiers back in especially if or when it became/becomes more sighted on the slopes and if marketed well. Scarpa should work with binding MFGs to push that agenda. What could be better than a telemark/AT/alpine setup?

    3rd: MFGs like Scarpa brought back the early gen TX Pro boot flex, with later Gen Intuition liners, but in a lighter rig, and of course with its tech heel (make it a secondary purchase mod option if you need to escape litigation issues). Also, and this is an extravagant but possibly doable a wanted feature, at the cuff to boot outside hinge, instead of Allen key lockdown have an over-center locking lever that not only locked in the cuff angle but, when released, allowed for some side to side free float in a “walk mode.”

  16. Are there any news on the tele boot? A boot inspired by the new Maestrale RS 2.0 series would be my dream tele-boot. 3 buckles, a power strap and a decent walk mode like the one found in the new Maestrales.

  17. I got lucky and picked up some TX’s before they were all gone, best for touring, should have the better buckle system the tx pro has and improve on the power strap top buckle( integrate to tour mode and one buckle opens or closes would be ideal)

    Add the tech fitting to TX Comp, so back to a 3 boot line up, ps keep the heel fitting, just adds versatility

  18. I just blew out the bellows on my candycane TRaces this past spring at Loveland and I am the market for new boots to drive my hammerheads. I’m glad Scarpa is reaching out and this makes me think about what I’m skiing on and if it’s time to change it up. I loved my TRaces which replaced bumblebees which replaced T2s. I love the lateral stiffness of that rig and the full flex of the boot. I’ve heard that the NTN can’t provide the same performance.

    I read the link to Dostie’s review of the TTS and that has some positives though I agree that the puny pins don’t see strong enough to handle the forces of a tele turn, though I’m game to try it out.

    For a new boot:
    What would happen if the pins were pushed out a little further from the toe on the Scarpa TX Pro to give a little more of the duck bill flex? I don’t think that would change the boot that much would it?

    The under-arch connection of NTN doesn’t seem like it would take advantage of the full boot flex. Is there a way to connect to the rear inserts of the tech boot instead? I’m not a big fan of the Bishops under boot plate which I think changes the flex of the boot too much.

    Last, lateral stiffness is important.

    I work in Boulder and be happy to stop in to check out any new designs.

  19. I don’t know anything about plastics and boot manufacturing but why not model it off the current F1? Much similar to the older F1 with bellows. (were those bellows soft?) Boa or 2 buckle? It’ll be nice to have heel inserts again to appeal to both crowds–tele and fixed heels but who knows what the future will hold due to that certain lawsuit.

  20. Suggestions for a touring Boot

    1) Back to the original spirit: lightness (1.3 kg?), soft or medium flex for walking and feeling the skis (NTN springs already provide adjustable resistance), a lot of ROM, not bulky (thinner liners, smaller metal pieces), optimum walking soles (thinner-lighter, replaceable?).
    2) Best of current technology: lateral stiffnes, high quality toe inserts, heel inserts, dineema/cable 3 bucklets plus a powerful strap, lighter liners, crampon and cable grooves.
    3) Some extras: harder or replaceable duckbutts as rock walking erodes them a lot, a bit longer strap for easy walking, soft and elegant color patterns, if possible.

    = a powerful skiing-skinning-walking boot-binding system that really upgrades telemark touring, also impacts nordic touring (as the system already works as a medium weight nordic equipment that provides extra power downhill), and will attract AT (and piste) skiers looking for new experiences. Life is longer enough to learn and enjoy both. Tele/alpine will be no longer enemies if a new user friendly “hybrid sport” arises (as Lito Tejada-Flores once dreamed).

  21. First, it warms my heart that there are so many folks psyched to see innovation and evolution in tele gear, especially boots!

    Living for several years in the Alps, I’ve had to work just a bit harder to keep pace with the AT and skimo crowd, especially at transitions and to make up for the heavier kit. So – no surprise – I’ll add my voice (also to reinforce to boot manufactures that there is market demand for new, lighter tele boots!) to those begging for lighter weight materials while not compromising stiffness or downhill performance.

    On materials, I see boots like Dynafit’s TLT (and others) that use higher-grade and lighter plastics or a combination of materials like kevlar or carbon to reduce weight. Can’t this same technology be applied to tele boots? While a bit clunky, there’s the removable booster tongue that you see in the TLTs – could this same design concept not also be applied to tele boots so that you have lighter materials and weight uphill and insert the booster to add stiffness on the down??

    I’ve been on Scarpa T1s and Voile Switchback X2s for the last 6 years. While not the lightest combo, I’ve found that it’s a decent weight-to-performance-to-reliability ratio. I’m looking to switch to NTN soon and a tele tech binding. The main reason is to ditch the duckbill so that I don’t have to modify every pair of crampons just so that they can fit! Also, on mixed ground, that duckbill doesn’t inspire confidence for precision (granted, it could just be me). So, like others on the thread, I’d strongly ask for an NTN tech toe boot that also retains the heel welt for crampons (and could be tech heel compatible).

    Love the ideas about Scarpa and others manufactures having at least 2 solid choices in the line-up: one geared more for touring and ski mountaineering and the other for inbounds use. For the touring model – and I’m no engineer – but why not consider the boa closure system as both a means of saving weight and adding a more dialed-in fit??

    Please, please, please manufacturers of tele boots, make a light weight, comfortable, high performance, tech toe compatible option for all of us who love the motion of the tele turn and will gladly shell out the dough for some overdue innovation in boots!!

  22. I wonder if the same number of folks who want to stay on 75mm wish that the interstate highway system was never built and we were still roaming around the country in wagon trains on dirt roads.

  23. I really like to have a lightweight telemark setup.
    The current lightweight bindings all use tech inserts (TTS, Meidjo and Moonlight). So we need inserts and a second heel. I really liked the old Scarpa F1 Boots. They were not designed for telemarking, but they worked fine. Last year I was able to get an extra pair of new F1 racing boots in my size (manufactured in 2012). I bought them, because I’m scared that I have to wait a long time for new lightweight telemark boots.

  24. WTF? I try to find a boot that will fit meidjo bindings, with heel inserts, but its not possible?
    The internet gives me nothing except two year old female boots? Yes, I read about the stupid scarpa lawsuit..

    So finally, we have some NEW binding technology, lighter skiis, but the boot manufacturers don’t follow?!?

  25. The duck butt seemingly can’t match the mid foot and ankle flex combo of the 75mm duckbill. The surfy, dancing flex of 75mm duckbill needs to be combined with a tall, stiff upper cuff that tours with great free pivot flex range in order to save the sport. It seems the glory days of the bumble bees yellow/black and dark knight silver/black tall cuff three buckle T1’s had the tragedy of unfortunate timing, being phased out right after free pivot 75 mm tele bindings took over the market. NTN is nice but tries to meet AT and tele in the middle. Excels at neither light touring nor full flex surf turning of tele. Please raise the duckbill Phoenix from the ashes with a better foot and ankle flexing, higher/stiffer cuff boot.

  26. In my dad’s day, tele gear meant you were going lighter, into the backcountry. The skis were lighter, the bindings were lighter, the boots were lighter.

    Now, of course, it’s the opposite. And it always will be: ski-mo racers will never tele, and that market is the only thing with the drive for hyper-light carbon fiber boots. Not only that, but tele bindings need a spring (and the good springs are chunky). AT bindings will always be lighter, AT boots will always be lighter.

    So for those of us to like to tour on tele gear, the only answer is lighter. My ski set-up will never be as light as my lame AT friends, but can you at least get it close? That means tech toes, it doesn’t necessarily mean a duckbutt (though the lateral stiffness is nice), and hell, as long as we’re here, I’ll take tech heels too.

  27. Sorry for the long post but I didn’t see room for this many comments in the survey, but if Scarpa wants to listen, here goes:


    I am a fan of your boots, so I do not have any major changes, but just some improvements to keep things at their best.

    I started on the old blue T2’s with Targas and they worked well for years. Just last year I moved to the TX Pro’s with Meidjo’s. The TX Pro has been a good boot for my intended use and the tech toe system for telemark is the future. So keep making the 75mm boots for a while, but the new boot line should focus on the tech system.

    There should be at least 3 boots with tech toes in the lineup. A two buckle boot, call it the S2 for Scarpa two buckle. A three buckle boot (S3) and a four buckle boot (S4). All boots need to have an attachment system under the arch and at the heel for providing resistance. If the NTN duckbutt is working and easy to manufacture it can continue, if not, it can be redesigned. Same with the heel, if the tech insert is working, keep it, but there needs to be something more than just a rounded heel.

    The S2 would have a buckle as near to the toes as possible (understanding that the bellows are also up there) and the other buckle still on the lower shell holding the heel from slipping in the pocket. A strap is fine for the upper part of the boot. This would be a light weight boot that could be used to replace the NNN BC system for rolling around the foothills in Colorado. It needs to be able to hold an edge on the skis better than my current Alpina 1550 boots and is the next boot that I am looking to purchase. The heel mechanism incorporated into the boot would help stabilize it like Moonlight is doing with their pure tele system.

    The S3 would be a step stiffer lower and have a third buckle on the cuff. I do like buckles as opposed to the ratchet strap that is on my old blue T2’s. They seemed to wear out over enough time. I could snowboard if I wanted ratchet straps.

    The S4 would be like the TX Boot with two buckles on the cuff and the stiffest lower boot option. I’m not as worried about different levels of bellow stiffness as bindings can somewhat adjust for the bellow stiffness in the boots, but cuff stiffness and range of motion is where I see room for boot maker improvement. For the TX Pro specifically, it could use some more negative range of motion for both gliding and walking. The forward range of motion doesn’t have to be as great as AT gear since we have a bellows.

    Having a good walk/ski connection is important and a place for invention. It needs to open up and be free of resistance for comfort, but when locked down could it engage a spring that would set the cuff stiffness? Just like how binding springs can adjust their stiffness, can you incorporate a user swappable spring for people to adjust the ankle flex stiffness? Currently, it seems like this is adjusted though the tongue by the manufacturer and users just complain about what they get. So the boots would have two major parts. The bottom and bellows around the lower foot that would have two buckles, and an upper cuff part around the calf with the flex between the two user adjustable with springs. Currently the second buckle from the toe on telemark boots is attached to the cuff and this is one of the major limiters of ROM. I’m not sure if the walk/ski connection would need a third setting to lock the boot solid if the spring flex was set appropriately. Telemarking can handle more flex than alpine as long as it is not side to side and only if the forward backward direction. This fancy walk/ski connection would be included on at least the S3 and S4 boots.

    Customization for different foot sizes could be helped with offering a range of liners. And of course, new lighter weight materials for a lighter boot would be SWEET!

    Thanks for listening.

  28. 2 different boots- a touring boot and a lift-serve boot-
    I will comment on the touring boot

    Touring boot- this thing should be an awesome mountain boot the makes AT folks consider
    1)Tech inserts toe and heel (Keep the welt on the heel for TTS or crampons)
    2) Lightweight- I agree with some of the above comments to use the F1 as inspiration for weight savings
    3) increased ROM
    4) Bellow flex based on tech ntn design
    5) Burly enough to ski big lines well- there are a lot of powerful light AT boots available

    Consider: Salewa had a adjustable shank on a ice climbing boot- you could lock the bellows out for kicking steps, clicking into an Alpine touring setup without a plate (so you still could use a ski crampon). I bet there would be a fair number of mountain folk who would be eager to have an adjustable bellows.

  29. I am currently find myself skiing more and more AT in my old Scarpa Lazers. Why? My current Garmont Synerg’s feel heavy, bulky and awkward to walk in comparison. Can you create a light weight tele boot that can ski was well as my Lazers which I love for their light weight, relative power, for my intermediate skill and the ease in which I can walk in them. Sometimes I use them as winter boot when I am snow blowing because I like the traction of the vibram sole :)

  30. Comfy boots, all the tele boots i ever bought were not comfy…I have Garmont Energy At in 2 sizes too big so they don’t hurt too much.
    I don’t care about anything else.
    Why lighter?
    and i don’t get one of the features people talk about, locked down heel? then you’re skiing, not telemarking….

  31. One more vote for lighter weight, ROM, not too stiff flex (loved the older t2) similar to terminator x that can’t buy anymore, more focused on alpine touring with a less fat ski that can be driven with TTS medejo style bindings (seems like all the boots now are focused on hill skiing and are way too much for longer day touring), miss the older liners that wrapped around get lots more pressure points on the tongue liners and they are too hot, also please don’t forget about women who love to tour, availability in smaller sizes. Most of the new boots I can barely flex and it doesn’t even feel like tele skiing anymore in them.

  32. I echo all those above who’ve requested a focus on light weight and range of motion. I am still skiing Garmont Synergy’s on Switchbacks and 78cm-waisted K2 World Piste skis and unfortunately don’t (yet) have much experience on more modern skis, NTN, or tech bindings. But in recent years I’ve also experimented with “XCD” type skiing, inspired by Steve Barnett and his philosophy. I absolutely love it and have even done some spring Cascade volcano descents on skinny Madhus skis and old 3-pin bindings. Last spring on Saint Helens, where the snow was good, I managed to actually ascend faster than the crowds on AT gear. When I got back on my (actually pretty light) “heavy” telemark rig, it seemed so constricted. Meanwhile my AT friends have boots so comfortable and light they can go hiking and climbing in them even when skiing isn’t on the agenda.

    Long story short… to me the Holy Grail is to maintain the modern standard of downhill performance and recover that freedom of movement and light weight that got so many people into telemark in the first place. When I see a 1kg-ish tele boot with a range of motion comparable to light weight AT boots, I will immediately bust out the credit card and buy it — and THEN figure out which of the many exciting TTS or NTN bindings to acquire.

  33. I’d prefer a traditional tele-heel-notch rather than heel inserts. The notch would provide another possible location for the heel-lever, which would give us the ability to drastically change the way TTS performs, on-the-fly (notch for flats and atop heel for downhill). This might prove advantageous over AT setups in flat and rolling terrain (billygoating). Better yet, incorporate a swappable heel-insert/heel-notch :-)

    For me, the TX-Pro (size 25) is too wide in the forefoot and the cuff does not accommodate large calves well. I still own a pair, but they are brand new and I don’t expect I’ll ever use them. My Green F1’s fit WAY better. Ever consider offering boots in different volumes? You can call one volume “womens” if you’d like (just no pink!)

    Do you folks still have those OG F1 and F3 molds (hint)? Both work very well with TTS. Wish they had bellow-guards tho. I swapped the stock power-straps with ones that don’t stretch. Makes the boots feel burlier.

  34. Scarpa boots fit me well. I own T3’s, T2’s, T1’s and Lasers. I’ve tried the Terminator X and TX-pro. They fit great.

    But now that the tech heel inserts were very unfortunately pulled from the NTN design, I’m scrambling to find a solution to satisfy my evolving taste for the ever-perfectible telemark turn. If I were able to find a pair of the 3-buckle Terminator X (lime and black), I’d probably buy it now, because they’re the closest thing to what I’ve been waiting for for years.

    And that is:
    – a relatively light weight boot (I’m hoping for sub-3kg/pair)
    – comfortable touring cuff flexibility (the TX-Pro don’t quite cut it in my opinion, when compared to most of the current AT offerings)
    – medium flex (deep powder doens’t forgive the tip-dive)
    – compatible with a releasable binding
    – the possibility to clip the heel down with tech inserts (made possible by The M-Equipment Meidjo and Moonlight Mountain Gear’s Tele-Rando bindings)

    I believe there will be a market for all those former telemark skiers who have gone to AT skiing in the last 10 years. If those skiers can be made aware that they have the option of clipping their heel and have the best of both worlds in a reliable system, then I suspect many will be tempted to mix up the quiver and indulge in some non-committal free-heel fun.

    The market is there, not the product… Please, please make it happen.

  35. So happy to hear about such developpment / survey

    I’m ready to buy Meidjo bindings with light-weight skis… the only missing thing for me is a LIGHT weight shoe for telemark-touring
    I would also be interested in having inserts at the heel (not sure I will use them, but would like to have such option for steep or difficult areas)

    I can keep my T2 eco in 75mm one more year to be sure I will invest in what fits my needs for the coming years.

  36. Hi,

    I ski the TX Pro (old version) black and yellow.
    My suggestions:
    – Keep the tech inserts
    – Keep Intuition liners but would suggest their Dreamliner model. You can choose thin, medium or thick liner. I use them already for my alpine ski boot and my AT boot (thin and medium respectively).
    – 3 buckles instead of 4
    – Extra large cam power strap (instead of 4th buckle and power strap) like your F1 light touring boot
    – Ski/walk mechanism like the F1 light touring boot
    – I really like the black/orange color.

  37. Matching bellows to likely binding type / flex would be interesting.
    Could bellows be swoped in and out?
    Could bellows be rated for stiffness like alpine boots?

    Suspect lighter would be great… but then I am still using T1s circa 2002, maybe things have changed

  38. I’ve been on 3 buckles TX for 3 seasons, averaging 60 days per season. I’m 100 kg , never broke the boot bellow and never saw someone breaking it except on the first production run many years ago.
    My TX is perfect as it is for skiing, just make a cuff which can articulate like an F1 and lighter. Please stick with 3 bukles and get back to the overlapping liners.

  39. I wear a size 13 shoe and want to make the switch, but cannot find a boot big enough. Please consider making larger sizes in a NTN boot.

  40. As many have said above, the missing link is a touring-oriented boot on the level of the Dynafit TLTs/Atomic Backlands/etc. etc. etc. Light weight (<2.5kg) with a huge range of motion for touring. I tour on a TTS system using old Scarpa F1s. They aren't ideal for telemarking but they work well and tour better than any telemark boot since my leather boots. That AT design emerged from tele boots – lets take it back the other direction with an NTN/tech fitting sole and a sole flex optimized for tele.

    There is no reason that tele boots can't have equivalent cuff mobility to AT boots. I doubt they can ever be as light (due to the bellows, NTN sole, and flexible sole requirements), but they could be far lighter than the TX NTN boots…

    I don't really care about the rear inserts, but some do. So why not include them… the cost/boot is minimal.

    From my perspective, Scarpa (and Crispi and Scott) should end up with 3 boots in their lines:
    * Light touring-oriented boot that still skis great << this is the key…
    * Softer lift/tour boot (TX-Pro)
    * Stiff lift boot (TX-Race)

  41. (I am on TX Comps and Freerides) Crispi-style bellows and a stiffer/more durable material on the front duckbill of the boot for NTN would be great. I know that the plastic depressions in the front duckbill have to do with skiing style, but it would be nice to have that area not wear so quickly resulting in play between the NTN boot-binding interface. I don’t know if this would make the metal toe-piece of the freeride break more easily, but this area needs to be improved and to me is the fastest wearing spot on the NTN boots along with the bellows. Also, it would be great if the TX Comp came with a stiffer intuition liner/shell. This seems reasonable if the Scarpa line is going to stratify more between touring and resort.

  42. I have a wide foot 112 mm and high arch, size 29. And it’s a problem to use Scarpa boots. The most offensive, Scarpa make a wide plastic (T4 tele for example), which I can comfortably use with liners of third company, but I can’t use boots with an original liners.

    I see two dream telemark boots:

    1. Lightweight touring boots of NTN standard, with thermoforming warm liners, with Dynafit tech inserts on toe AND heel, with more range of motion on cuff in walk mode for touring (T4 has not enough range of motion), with softer flex but , hard torsion strength, to use it’s with lightweight bindings like Meidjo with possibility to lock heel. The similar version of 75 mm with 3-pin will be good idea.

    2. Lightweight boots of NTN standard, with thermoforming warm liners, with Dynafit tech inserts on toe AND heel, with more range of motion on cuff in walk mode for touring to use it’s with lightweight bindings like Meidjo with possibility to lock heel. Also required 4 buckles, power strap, 110 flex as a minimum, hard torsion strength. The similar version of 75 mm will be good too.

    For the both boots two version of liners required: for thin foot and for wide foot and high arch.

    Walk mode is very important in Russia, because sometimes you need walk about 70 km before you will come into the mountains (Polar Urals). :)

    The my main thing before I bought my current Crispi Evo, was Dynafit tech inserts on heel. Scarpa stop placing it into them boots. This was critical for me. My current 75mm boots is a BD Push and Garmont Excursion.


  43. I know Kim Miller and have sent him my thoughts on Tele boots over the last couple years. I’m glad that Scarpa is willing to listen to us and hopefully incorporate our needs into a new boot line. I ski more BC than area but tat can vary depending on conditions. I’m currently skiing 2 boots and 3 bindings on a variety of skis from ultralight to Voile BC’s to big fat powder boards, 95-118mm UF. My TX Pro’s is my Meidjo, NTN FR compatible boot. I use the TX Pro more in area and big BC terrain. I also have a Scarpa F1 (original) and it’s used almost exclusively with the TTS binding but sees some use with Dynafit/ Tech bindings locked down on occasion.

    What I love about the F1 is the light weight, ease of movement to touring from ski and back and the excellent range of motion on the cuff. What I’d love to see is an NTN version of this boot with the light weight and large range of cuff motion for touring. Keeping the Tech fitting toe and heel.

    I would still like to see a new TX Pro with lighter weight less buckles, easier ski to tour trabsition and back, similar stiffness as the current ver., more range of motion of the cuff and Tech fittings toe and heel.

    I would be a happy and content man if I could get those features in those 2 boots.

  44. Very exciting news! I think the results will be positive no matter what happens – tele boot designs haven’t changed dramatically in a long time.

    I have one idea:
    Given the range of preference in ball-of-foot flex, wouldn’t it be cool to be able to adjust this flex? I imagine a boot that you could set to soft for rolling terrain kick-and-glide, stiffer for downhill performance (as your preference dictates). Heck, you could even make the boot lock out and market it to AT skiers who want a more comfortable touring boot.

    I’m not an engineer, so I don’t have any great ideas on how this would be done. I do think it would require a shift away from the bellows design.

  45. I started 25+ years ago on Asolo extremes and graduated to T2 for many years . When it came time to pick a new setup i went NTN and Crispi/Rottefella. I’m now on a crispi evo and have a crispi shiver but i’ve skiied the TxComps and was not pleased.
    My .02c is that the scarpa boots have superior liners and hardware (buckles/straps) but the crispi bellows are way better. If scarpa is making a new boot my requests are:
    -stiffer bellows-I like an active feel and the ntn system requires a beefier bellows to drive the skis
    -lower volume-I know this is a longshot but the instep on most scarpas are YUGE on me and I cannot wear them as a result
    -sculpted heel pocket-this is already pretty good on the TX Comps I owned for 5 runs last year but could be a little better
    -all the inserts-just get on with it already-make me a boot that I can step into a dynafit, ntn and alpine binding-shit if you can make it with a 3pin toe and accept a heel bail thats even better.
    -lightweight-i’d love a four buckle boot thats suitable for touring on.
    -pay close close attention on an ntn setup on where the boot ‘breaks’ for the forefoot-especially the smaller sizes suffer from too ‘tippy toe’ break-move it further back towards the heel if possible.
    -hardware that is user servicable -if that q strap breaks let me fix it please

    PS i’m in Boulder so if you want me to come by and have a mold of my feet taken thats ok too. I’ll even field test those suckers to make sure you got it right.

  46. Need a freetour tele boot in the same weight class and with equivalent ROM as the Beast/Khion or the Maestrale RS. Nowadays inserts are a must.

  47. I wnat a waterproof TX Pro. Fantastic boot in combination with Freedom bindning but it is leaking worse than my old Asolos!

  48. I want a waterproof TX Pro. The boot i s perfect in combination with Freedoms but is leaking worse than my old leather boots!

  49. Tele skiers need gear as supportive as Alpine gear and as lite as AT gear!! Wait, we have all that –At and Alpine gear.
    There’s a lot of anxiety over the future of Telemark skiing (if forum chatter means anything at all) as folks ponder ways to keep the sport alive and spread the ..stance, and one thing is for sure: 10000 new boot and binding options that require massive infusions of $$$$ just to squat and bend at the knees, sure will hasten the end — or relegate the sport to the moneyed classes. Somehow all the gear options have to get simpler and reasonably priced.

  50. Kevin Radford
    I have gone away from the (previous)Garmont Voodoo, and the Scarpa boots because i feel like the boots keep getting the “burlier, stiffer is better treatment”, but that only gets put into the cuff and lateral movement of the boot. The BELLOWS have not kept pace! That is why i have gone to the Crispi XR. The bellows are more inline(stiffness, even flex, some rebound!) with the newer boots. Bellows! Bellows! Bellows! Please and thanks.

  51. I am new teleskier (nobody told me it was this much fun!), lifelong Alpiner, reformed AT skier and Nordic ski racer (CL + FS). Weight wise, leaving AT behind was difficult for me (as was the sweet ascending techtoe). Tele gear for mountain touring is so much heavier!! I love the light weight and minimalism of Nordic touring gear and mindset. I find the weight and capability is actually very similar to the current crop of overpriced, uphill (98%/2%) oriented, overpriced, carbon skimo race gear. How about a Race75 boot that can hang with the Alien crowd? For pure Nordic Touring, the Alpina Alaska is an awesome boot that is available in 75 mm. Why are there VERY few choices in a simple & light Nordic touring boot? I like how many skiers have skied into the vacuum with their BC-NNN boots & bindings and have begun to go long (>10km) for low angle turns, trees, pow harvesting. The forgotten XCD crowd has successfully pushed this gear well beyond it’s intended design envelope. Perhaps the market needs some sexy Scarpa BC-NNN boots for these purposes? Minimalism and high function appeal to me. Greater numbers of skiers live in terrain that is suitable for capable Nordic Touring gear. The bindings do not seem to be the limiting factor – everybody who says you can’t do this will tell you that you’ll rip the toe bar right out the boot. In reality it doesn’t seem to happen that often but let’s see what Scarpa can do to improve BC-NNN ? Thanks!

    1. yes, telemark has been re-branded “nordic touring” or “XCD” by the industry. Don’t know why more leather 75mm aren’t out there but it’s encouraging that several beefy NNNBC options are available. NNNBC is vastly inferior to simple Rottefella or Voile 3-pin for downhill turns however.

      As for me, I’m stockpiling Crispi Antarctics, Andrew Zenith and Alico’s like there’s no tomorrow! leather and lace is real telemark. IMO if you put heavy, stiff plastic boots on you might as well ski AT. and oh yeah…..Asnes!!!

  52. I agree with Krazy Klimber, a true hybrid tele tech boot. A stiffer TXPro base with a locking bellows, heel inserts. 30yr free heeler about to transition to Meidjos. Thanks for asking!

  53. Something akin to the F3 with an ntn sole. I love that boot on my lite weight touring ski/tts setup.
    Add in a bit more cuff range of motion and keep it affordable, that would be a winner in my books.

  54. Its important to note that what telemark needs is a new BACKCOUNTRY boot and that should be the focus as there are already plenty of clunky, heavy resort boots on the market. I agree with most of the above comments and I think there is much to be learned and borrowed from the development of AT boots. It pains me to admit this but I have been using SCARPA Aliens for about a year now because although I don’t like making alpine turns I can cover way more ground and abuse my body less by using a lighter setup with more ROM(range of motion). Weight and ROM are the most important aspects in a new backcountry tele boot. Light AT boots like the Alien and F1 show that 4 buckles aren’t necessary to control light skis, however the ankle buckle design of current SCARPA tele boots is crucial for locking the heel down and providing a flex point at the ankle. New boots need to be designed to work with light bindings (TTS, Meidjo, and hopefully a 22-Designs tech binding) and light skis. It appears that NTN is here to stay but it would be really nice if there was a 75mm boot that incorporated these concepts as well. Come on SCARPA we need this! This feed shows there is a market!!!

  55. Please make a SKIMO-boot for tele tech bindings. I enjoy the free movement of the ankle in SKIMO boots, and would love to have the same lightweight and running shoe like feeling when touring on telemark. It is ironic that SKIMO skis with AT bindings are lighter and easier to tour then any tele binding and boot combination now days.

  56. Great to hear there’s development in Tele-boots!
    I agree with many of the posts and would like to see (at least) two lines of boots:
    – A Really lightwight boot with NTN & Tech inserts (at least front), to enable lighter touring with TTS or Meidjo and light skis. This could enable touring a bit more like in the old days (going easlily over loger distance on flat terrain) but with a modern touch and stability so that even the downhill will be good
    – Continued development of the TX Pro/Comp range, with tech inserts at least in the front of both to enable using Meidjo. I am very happy with the TX Pro exactly as it is today!

  57. Tech inserts on the toe AND heel. What’s the point of removing the inserts on the heel? I love the option to just have one boot for both telemark and alpine skiing!

  58. RE your fantastic 75mm boots: they are a wheel of sorts and not broken, no need for a fix! Nothing will replace the simplicity and effectiveness of 75mm overall.

  59. My husband is switching to NTN this year, while I keep my 75mm’s. I would love to switch as well, but I can’t find a boot that fits me! Women have so few options. I need a boot the fits my foot and provides the stiffness and responsiveness that a men’s boot provides. I can find CUTE boots that are REALLY comfortable but collapse when I work them. Women rip! We need equipment options that provide good fit and responsiveness to more than one foot shape. I have a high instep and it is impossible to find a boot I can secure tightly and also maintain circulation.

  60. Today I am using TX Comp which is an excellent boot :-)
    A stiffer and lighter boot with tech insert would possibly make me change. Why not make a TX Comp II?

    Have run Crispi Evo and a number of T1 before the TX Comp (and a number of boots not worth mentioning)

    If all the patents would be free, we could have real development on the binding side. Why not a stiffer Meidjo-type of binding but combined with a front/toe plate?

  61. Wider!! and higher!! TX comp (I have wide feet and high arches and my boot fitter always have to punch the shells to the max. Skiers who want them thinner can choose another brand, I have nothing else to choose from)
    Reworked bellows (all of my T pairs of TX comp have cracks starting to form. One of my friends has had 3 pairs of TX Pro, all have cracked in the bellows within 1 year)
    Redesign the walk mode lock. (After 1 season of skiing in a pair of TX Comp while never unlocking the tour mode, I went for a week of touring in Norway ISIA safety course. The walk mode was after 3 days of touring so worn that it did not lock properly in the first position. Granted, I had ca 100 days of skiing in the boot by that time. Anyway, a boot aught to last 2 seasons! If you don’t agree, then state on the box how many days of skiing one can expect to get out of a boot.)
    Bring back the no walk mode metal part as an option to the walk mode. It stiffens up the whole boot (I moved my first generation TX comp component, to save the above mentioned newer boot.)
    I have had the main connection between the shoe and shaft fall out a couple of times. Please redesign, that should not occur ever!
    When everything else is fixed, please make the TX Comp a little bit stiffer too.

    Every year I have to have a new boot in the process of fitting and one that I ski in. If I could trust I would get 2 years of use out of one shell I would only have to fit new boots every other year instead of every year. That would be excellent, it would save lots of time and money!

  62. Only the telemark community would reach out for this kind of feedback…this is what makes this group so great.

    If anything I want to see telemark – in any form – stay alive. The “let’s always make money” mindset of the ski industry is always against us. Therefore tech toes AND tech heels on all NTN or similar boots.

    I only ski on 75mm so I’d love for it to stay alive too. Especially for resort days because I really want a set of skis with Bishop bindings.

  63. A boot that skis like the Crispi Evo Rando but is lighter and has better cuff ROM. Coming from the TX Pro the performance of the Crispi’s just blow it out of the water. The TX Pro is an overcooked noodle from cuff to bellows that really struggles to drive a big ski. In the Scarpa world I imagine comps would better suit my skiing but continuing to insist on leaving the tech fittings off doesn’t really make them a viable option in todays tech binding tele world.

  64. Lighter boots in both 4 buckle and 3 buckle. A carbon/composite sole that has a designed flex built into the material, should take some of the load off the binding for lateral stability. Adjustable lateral cuff flex adjustment for steep, icy traversing. Duck bill, duck Bill; Duck Bill \!<

  65. Please please please go stiffer. I feel like my tx comps are half as stiff as my old bd customs. Also, why not some sexy colors like the old candy canes.

  66. There are very few options that are a good fit for women with a narrow foot except for the Scarpa T2/T3 – and very hard to find a women’s 10.5 /43 …it,s a good boot but would benefit from an inner lace to give more support for the big leaps. I have several several pairs of skis, and 3 diff boots, Excursions, Scarpas and Crispi for different days, whether climbing with skins, or long touring out to deep and steeps, or riding the groomers. Why can’t we have a nice comfy boot that has the ability to be cinched tight for steeps, or laced soft for touring? And able to fit a bale, as well as a spring/stiff binding like the hammerhead? I want one boot that I can do it all with. Also love the transitional leather boots we all had in the old days, those are the boots that get people hooked on the backcountry. That is the best boot to learn the turn, and be comfy in. Build them again and they will come! :)

  67. I still have my old scrapa T2 purchased in the late 90’s.
    I love them and they still do great. How about new liners?
    Keep the boots simple and accessible to get other folks to try a new sport – it’s hard for people to justify another set of gear but if it’s affordable it could be worth it.
    Getting more people out trying the sport can only add the pool of experience.
    Still have my chillis too ;)

  68. Leather to plastic the transition has always been an improvement. For bindings, from SuperLoop to the evolution of more active bindings the transition has been awesome. The challenge of being able to carve both skis throuigh the radius of a telemark turn is pure nirvana for a skier. The Hammerhead trace combo was cutting edge. NTN takes telemark to another level. Bindings are now becoming more refined. Freeride is awesome. Freedom cuts weight and gives similar performance but may not take the reps of an aggresive skier. Outlaw has a nice smooth engagement and is just as active as the Rottefella bindings. The TX Pro has sofetr belows and is not as stiff laterally as the TX Comp. Crispi World Cup has a nice flex and a very good sole to ski feel although not laterally as stiff as the TX Comp. I like being able to feel the ski withe the Crispi versus the Scarpa. Whatever you choose boot fit between Scarpa and Crispi could drive your choice based on your foot dimension. Have skied the Garmont/Scott and did not prfer that boot as it can collapse and pinch toes at front of boot with the bail on front of binding. Whatever your choice go NTN. You need to ski it at leasat 3 days. 75mm needs to go away and at is like snowboarding!

  69. *NTN + front and rear tech attachments, with a groove for the crampon bail
    *Vibram-type sole
    *A strap/buckle that will actually help hold the heel down in the boot.
    *Good ROM and lateral rigidity
    *Room enough for wide feet

  70. Thanks Craig! Very excited to hear that a fire is being lit in the Scarlatti NA boardroom. Low cost, simple suggestion: re-use the original F1 mold with NTN second heel added and adjust durometer of bellows plastic. Limits cost of new molds and gives tele-tour fans a great light boot with outstanding cuff ROM. Would work with NTN/Outlaw, tele-tech, and AT tech bindings. Tell Kim “you’re welcome”! :-)

    1. I have skied, to their death, three pairs of F1 Carbon’s with TTS over several years. I completely agree with Bruce. With some changes this would be the beginning of a great Tele boot. Bellows needs work and add an NTN duckbut. Cuff is one of the best designs out there.

  71. Hey Scarpa, a word for the happy minority:
    I just hope that after wading through all of these obsequious and fawning posts, you keep producing the great 75mm options you are so famous and respected for! Not everyone has the ridiculous amounts of $$$$ all the new binding “options” require and neither are they interested in becoming mechanical engineers to just mount, tweak and and fix all of the junk involved. Some of us just want to SKI, and to ski on Voile 3pin/Cables, Switchbacks and Hardwire3-pins! Ok, and maybe even Cobras, Chillis and Rivas et al! For those of us with REAL Tele skills, whence the need for all the new and expensive and sure-to-break junk?
    Keep the T2eco’s, T4’s, T1’s, and Trace’s coming! ( If you can’t ski a steep slope in control on 3pinCables and T4’s, you need a new sport!)

    1. Raven,
      Since your skills are so evolved and you are so mighty, perhaps this was not the place for you to post? Many of us continue to ski steeps, firm snow, and other challenges with cable binders and 75mm duckbills, and still want improvements in the gear we use day in and day out. The point of the article, and the question itself was, what do you, the tele-skier want? It was not “How will you bag on other skiers with a holier than thou attitude?”

  72. The biggest opportunity is in a lighter weight, softer boot that is compatible with the lighter BC skis w waxless patterns. Boots like the T4, Excursion, Fischer 675 that are driving skis in rolling terrain with waist widths 70+ mm. A package like a T4, Voile 3pin/cable and Fischer Sbounds 112/125/Madshus Annum is a super versatile setup and relatively low cost. People are using AT in terrain where the above setup would work but have to deal with transitioning between the ups and downs. People see the duckbill and know it’s old and they want new and exciting and are paying for AT. There is still some binding development needed (touring w resistance for control on the mellow downs) This will get more people exploring the backwoods and feeling the freeheel freedom. The lack of a simple, light weight boot/binding option keeps me from jumping to NTN.

  73. Agree with a lot that has already been posted here.
    What is lacking in tele boots is a lightweight, but stiff 3 buckle tech fitting boot. If that takes carbon to make it light then use it.
    Also should be a very warm boot for long tours or hut trips.
    There are plenty of super stiff 4 buckle resort boots.
    There is no sense going to a tech binding if your boots weigh 9 pounds.

    My 2 cents.

  74. A complete rework of the T4. Lighter like the F1. NTN. Intuition liners.
    A skimo boot for tele skiers that can exploit the new lighter, releasable, brakes-on bindings. Enough lateral power for Nordic patrolers to control a sled without having to be built like a linebacker.

  75. My biggest qualm with my duckbill T1s is the forward lean. They feel great in the shop, but on the hill, my quads are always engaged and it feels like I’m wearing high heels. If I start making parellel turns, I’ll sometimes even flip into walk mode to stand up taller and relieve my quads.
    I’ve been teleing for close to ten years and these are the first boots I’ve had such an issue with, and a cousin of mine reports the same.
    Also, a low volume boot, kind of like climbing shoes. I don’t mind if it’s men’s vs women’s line of HV vs LV, but as someone with a super skinny, low volume foot, I find myself cranking my buckles down far too tight to achieve a good fit, at which point the boot is much more stiff than I would like. This is one of my biggest issues with the T1s

  76. I am happy with my 75mm T-race boots and hope you continue a 85mm line for another decade which is how long I think I can tell ski.

  77. Well I’m sticking with 75 mm boots and when they are gone I’ll go back to Alpine skiing, so please keep making some for another decade at which point t I’ll be in my mid 60’s and Alpine will be just fine.

  78. I am curious about the comments on even flex across the TX PRO. I love my TX PRO’s (because they actually fit my low volume foot) and I must be compensating for the soft flex pattern with active bindings. I am on the Outlaws.

    I would love a boot that can lock out the bellows so, when traveling, I need only one pair of boots with me. Plus – there is considerable effort to get one boot to properly fit and, once I accomplish that, I don’t want to have to rinse and repeat in a different boot shell. What this will mean to boot manufacturers is that I will wear out my one pair of boots (practical limit of days in boot) sooner and be willing to consider new pairs with new capabilities more often. I have NO issue with that when I consider the huge advantage of having one boot that is warm and comfortable and optimizes my turn whether my heels are confined or not.

  79. Awesome post, Thanks Craig.

    I would really move the market two ways:
    1. for the top downhillers… big stiff boots with better touring capacities. (inserts, acceptable range of motion, reasonable weight…)
    2. for the tourers… super light, super range of motion.

    Bigger and stiffer have been seen in some 75mm model like the red T-Race or the BD custom. It seems this was not needed at first with the NTN Freeride. But with the NTN Freedom and now the more even flex 22 design Outlaw, this is a must. And if you go the TTS way, this is even more important in my mind. I just can’t ski the TX-pro with the Meidjo and a big ski. I’m happy with the Crispi WC but I would take more power still.

    For the traditional form and the feeling, I think the light boot with descent downhill capacities is a big market for us. This is where we lost most of the telemark tribe to the Rando market.

  80. Generally really happy with the TX Comp in terms of performance and fit. Please keep using the real Intuition Liners. All others are just a throw-away.

    I have one boot for all purposes – touring and resort skiing – over 100 days per year about 60/40 resort/touring.

    Flex of the TX Comp is a good balance. My wish list is pretty simple:

    1. Tech toes as a minimum (lots of good touring dedicated options now with tech toes)
    2. Taller cuff in smaller sizes (Size 24.5 is a pretty low cuff height)
    3. Slightly more ROM in walk mode; this would help touring days on Freerides rather than Freedoms
    4. Tech heel just because (I’d likely never use it, however)

    Thanks for asking us for input.

  81. Lighter for sure and much more cuff mobility! Would love a stiff boot like the t race. Also the last get mid step (second buckle from the toe) on my last Gen t-race were not tight enough. Had to switch to a smaller strap. Need more variation In tightness of the mid strap. Power straps like the booster straps would be rad as well.

    Stoked to see the new boots! Might have to make the switch once they come out.

  82. Even Flex across the entire boot:

    Problem with my current TX Pros (2015/16) is the bellows are too soft. But the cuff is great for me and is quite stiff.
    Can lead to tippy toe and since the cuff overpowers the bellows, it is not a good match.

    Never had this issue with Scarpa 75mm boots. The T2Xs had a great even flex in my memory. I’d love to have the fit and flex of that boot back (red) with the addition of NTN, tech inserts front and back, light weight and better ROM.

    I already have 2 pairs of TX Pros that are new enough that they don’t need replacing. What would a new boot need to make me shell out more money:
    1. Even flex across the boot would do it alone.
    2. Light weight would seal the deal.
    3. Better ROM would be appreciated, but really for me, the other two are more important.

  83. Would like a true hybrid tele-tech boot. Inserts and cuff mobility are obvious, but need a mode contraption that frees/fixes the flex of the foreboot. Could be a three-way mechanism that locks down cuff then foreboot in succession so has tour->tele->alpine modes.

  84. I have scarpa TX pro – skid
    Rottefella freedom and dynafit radical touring in Japan. They were the most comfortable system I had tried! Now I ski the M Equip, and as a Nordic instructor don’t see much reason for heal inserts unless you have to ski alpine – however to include everyone on tours there are some who would prefer the hybrid system off tts and heal lock down. Scarpa boots fit my foot better than any other manufacturer I’ve tried, so we look forward to the next generation!

  85. YES! NTN is here to stay and our telemark tribe needs some lightweight boots to match the freedom and outlaw’s uphill-ness. Not to mention that there are so few choices nowadays – if the shoe fits wear it and get out there because it’s awesome. We are people too.

  86. I wish for a easy to enter reliable and light binding paired to a smooth flexing boot that maintains a flow feel with power . Amen

  87. I wish for a binding that maintains the flow feeling of a tele turn and a boot that offers power. I wish for a reliable system that is easy.

  88. Very interesting information from Scarpa team. I am glad to see that a new teleboots line will be designed taking into account latest bindings release and expectations from Telemarkers. When can we expect to see these new Scarpa boots ?

  89. Great idea! i dream of 2 ntn boots, both with tech inserts

    1) a big mountain boot that is as stiff as the red T1 race. I moved on to the TX Comp, really good boot, but not as snug nor precise as the T1 race.The toe box could also be a tad smaller.

    2) a true touring ntn boot. That is in my wildest dreams. The power of ntn plastic, light, functional, warm, to be paired with Meijdjo with soft springs and zag ubac like skis, nice and versatile to go out far in the Alps. Reminiscent of the good old leather boots, or scarpa T3 later renamed T4, the only plastic boot that had a leather feel. No rocker please, and higher than the T3, that cut the calfs on edging. Maybe base it on your F1.

  90. Amazing! I’m super excited to see the new developments. I ski the TX Pro (the 2 pairs I have both have heel and toe tech inserts – yes!) and would really appreciate a more even flex: bellows vs cuff. (bellows are too soft). I have 2 pairs because the usual 27.0 (previous Scarpa boots) were too volumous and my feet slid around, banging the ends. So I got the 27.5, which work better but are a touch loose feeling – at least there is no bang.

  91. As you said : lighter weight (much lighter), more cuff mobility, same stiffness as a TxComp, front / rear inserts.
    And nice colors please, don’t redo the F1 EVO / TxPro joke.

    Deal ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.