First Look: 22 Design’s Lynx

One thing is clear after checking out 22 Design’s Lynx. Some of the details may change by the time Lynx is produced by the thousands but Lynx confirms that the core components of a 2-pin tech toe and spring tension on the 2nd heel yield the best tele sensation I’ve ever felt in over 30 years of dipping the knee.

For the neophytes and grey-haired doubters, the low-tech toe yields the best lateral power transfer ever for a telemark system. The edging power of the first NTN binding was impressive, but snapping tight at the toe of the boot with metal pins only ups the ante. Of course, the low-tech toe also delivers the most efficient ski touring possible; there is no resistance to lifting your heel and you only lift the boot, not the boot and binding hardware like with a plate or 75mm telemark touring binding.

NTN Power Train

The part of the turn equation that you’ll notice most, especially if you’re coming from a binding where the cable connects at the real heel, is how smooth the power transfer is. With heel cables each inch of heel lift increases tip pressure on the ski. When the spring tension is applied to the boot at the second heel, effectively in the middle of the sole, the resulting power transfer feels smoother because the lever arm is shorter with less pressure applied at the tip. The result reminds me of the sweet flex of leather with the power of plastic. How Lynx does that is unique, borrowing some from 22D’s past, with a new spin for the future.

 22 Design's Lynx
A pair of coil springs are hidden under the composite leaf spring with a 2-pin tech toe.

Tele Ho!

For the average skier the mechanics of how the Lynx achieves the magic tension that is possible only with an NTN connection is less of a concern than the sensation it delivers. To which I can say it’s on par with the fantastic performance of Meidjo or Outlaw. I skied Lynx side-by-side with both and while there are differences, they are subtle.

For comparison the Outlaw had a standard spring set on 3, Meidjo was also set to 3 with a doubled-up standard spring, and Lynx was at the “factory” setting as determined by Chris and Collins. Of the three, Lynx engaged the fastest, while Outlaw had the most power. In a quick survey of three other Lynx testers at the WWSRA demo at Copper mountain (Jan. 29-20, 2018) they all said the Meidjo was slightly stronger, or more active than Lynx, as evidenced by a stronger rebound at the end of the turn. To my reckoning, Meidjo and Lynx were nearly indistinguishable.

Cat Power

With the Lynx tele-résistänçe, the tension that adds control to the rear ski, comes from the combination of steel compression coil springs (classic 22 DNA), and two strips of composite fiberglass acting as a leaf-spring. The second heel claw is positioned on the rear sheet with a two-position cam on the sides that holds the claw upright for turns, or tipped back for touring so it can’t grab the duckbutt or get in the way of the boot sitting flat.

 22 Design's Lynx
The 2nd heel claw has a 2 position cam that keeps it down for touring (shown) or upright for turns.

A pair of coil springs sit underneath, connected at the back of the toe baseplate via braided steel cable to a yoke that ties the claw and rear composite leaf together. There is an adjustable steel plate that determines where the leaf-spring bends upward. It is held in place with the same slick pin used to adjust cable pivot location on the Axl or Vice.

Adjustable Power?

I tried all three positions and the difference was subtle at best. On my first comparison I thought the forward position was more active than the rear. Ha! Thankfully the slick pins were relatively easy to swap in the field. (Note: To get past the second side you need to wiggle a bit until it pulls through.) I moved the pin from the rear to the front and still could barely tell the difference. Maybe with a placebo pill I would be more perceptive.

I think the effective pivot location for the spring tension is dominated by the location of the cable anchoring the coil springs. The relative bending position of composite leaf-springs does affect the perception of power when initiating a turn, but once the heel is lifted more than, say seven degrees, the tension from the coil springs dominate and there is no discernable difference between any of the leaf bending positions.

 22 Design's Lynx
Coil springs beneath provide the majority of power. Leaf springs deliver immediate tension when lifting the heel. Or none if the claw is down (shown) for touring.

The Lynx beta spring used a round wire coil spring and the final will definitely use flat wire springs to allow for more compression travel distance. There will probably also be a stiffy spring option. It is possible that Lynx could be more ‘active.’ However, Meidjo or Outlaw could be noticeably more active too. The main point is that the performance of all three is more similar than different, all sharing nearly immediate engagement and a smooth power curve that won’t overdrive the tips of your skis like bindings that connect at the real heel.

Step-In & Mode Shifting

Whether I chose one over the other would be more a matter of other factors than the tele sensation they deliver because all are the best there has ever been in the tele kingdom. For the best touring efficiency, a 2-pin toe is the way to go. For simple mode shifting, Outlaw takes the cake, but Lynx is only slightly more fiddly, requiring you to step out of the toe to retract the claw, then re-connect the toe pins. For step-in convenience, Outlaw doesn’t require precise toe alignment, but the second heel connection of the Lynx takes less downward force for the claw to snap on.

Pin Power

The toe piece of the Lynx felt like a competent execution of the classic low-tech design. There were no alignment bumpers but the pins were close enough that it was easy enough to visually line up pins with inserts and step in first time about 90% of the time. The pins closed with a reassuring snap – stronger than a Dynafit but not quite as forceful as a G3 toe. With practice anyone can get in as easy as I did but newbies to the 2-pin realm would appreciate some form of visual alignment. Whether that’s in the final production version will depend on patent issues.

 22 Design's Lynx
2-pin toe with adjustable “cable” tension.

Touring Efficiency

Touring performance was not tested, but there is little doubt Lynx will be as efficient as any other 2-pin binding weighing a pound per foot (480g).

Safety Release?

As with any other telemark binding, Lynx has standard telemark releasability — possible but unlikely and definitely NOT certified. I can imagine the claw retracting if there were enough sideways force and the 10° bevel on the sides of the 2nd heel helps it potentially slide out. But it is not a feature that is claimed or promoted. Outlaw isn’t releasable either but, thankfully, there are certainly recorded incidents of it happening.


Fuhgetaboutit! This is a touring binding. Brakes add weight and no one has developed a telemark ski brake that retracts inside the plane of the ski edges. If and when 22D has the inspiration to develop that it may be incorporated. If you must have brakes, get the Outlaw or Freeride. Otherwise, get a leash with a small gauge wire loop “calibrated” to break in an avalanche.

Heel Post

As of this writing the Lynx heel post has yet to be developed. Due to the low profile the standard heel posts for Axl and Outlaw are so tall they prevent the boot from dropping low enough for the claw to slip over the second heel. So for demo purposes a Vice heel post was used. The ideal climbing heel post for Lynx may be even lower, which raises the possibility that 22D’s spring activated climbing wire may be available on a shorter post that can work with competitor’s tele bindings. If we’re really lucky, it will have the option to switch between a low and high wire.


No dedicated Lynx crampons at this point, but the slots are there for them, so they will be an option. When? Hold your horses cowboy! It’s still beta season for the Lynx and too early for anyone to know. There might be a Dynafit or B&D option that works already. There’s also Skeats in a pinch.


No doubt when the conditions are ripe for icing there is bound to be some collecting around and under the toe springs. The activity adjustment bar is steel, so that’s bound to collect some too. However, I don’t foresee it clinging to the composite plates, and with the claw remaining open, it won’t collect there either. Thus, the forecast for Lynx icing up remains possible, but not catastrophic.


So what’s the bottom line? The Lynx appears capable of turning 22 Designs into the world’s premier telemark binding company. It sports a similar downhill feel as Outlaw, with the touring efficiency of Dynafit’s legendary low-tech system, combined with 22D’s reputation for durability. Loyal 22D customers will appreciate the use of their classic Hammerhead 6-hole mounting pattern. When compared to other low-tech bindings that have zero telemark capability, and especially compared to the one that does, the price sounds reasonable too.

22 Designs plans to produce a limited quantity of 500, available November 2018.

22 Designs
Estimated MSRP: $500
Estimated weight (per/binding): Small – 17 oz. (480g) , Large – 18 oz. (500g)
Mounting: 22D 6-hole

© 2018

23 thoughts on “First Look: 22 Design’s Lynx

  1. Hello, this reply is for Seth. who queried re: a breakable leash. Yes there are such a thing and they work very well.Take a look at Basically, there is a breakable ‘fuse link’ that if you are caught in an avy, they stretch to the full extent of the coiled leash (approx. 5ish feet), once fully extended the fuse breaks. The kit comes with several of 2 sizes of breakable fuse links. They are exceptionally nice if you are on a ridge top and doing a ‘ski off’ transition, the ski is still attached to the you via the coiled leash and you can do all the fiddling you want without the concern of watching your ski leave the top without you!!! My wife and I have used them for years on our touring set up. Never tour without them…. sometimes there is cross over when accessing the resort slack country and they are not intrusive or much of a hassle, we use leashes on all set-ups/full time. Hope this helps
    Jamie Joseph
    Castlegar BC

  2. Craig – I was struck by your comment: “Otherwise, get a leash with a small gauge wire loop “calibrated” to break in an avalanche.” Does anyone make such a leash, or have you made one yourself? Also, what are your thoughts about ditching leashes altogether when in avy terrain? Seems sensible to me as leashes are really just a tool to comply with ski area policy to prevent a runaway ski. Thanks – Seth

  3. Update on Meidjo 2.1. Used it extensively now. Skis brilliantly, tours well. Got used to stepping in with ski brakes (the system works). Minor icing issue in Trois valleys after a long day; I just carry a tool to poke ice out (all bindings ice in my experience, but M 2.1 very good, just keep them clean). Most important that sets them apart is release function is a knee saver, it works. Had several wipeouts (boarders off piste!!!). My 15 year old daughter races in them (she has ditched her Rottefellas). Top Mark’s. Only other issue is crack on the plastic release mech. I fixed it in the field with 2 part epoxy putty & got going again quick. Good in mixed UK/Scotland backcountry conditions (when it snows-incrasingly rare now with Global warming).

  4. Paul- the Scarpa F1 will not work with this binding as it does not have the NTN heel, aka duckbutt. Furthermore, it does not have the requisite bellows.

  5. So I read thru a bunch of this and am pretty confused. Simple question I guess. I have a full on AT setup that is great for it’s intended purpose. In NE we have a lot of rolling terrain that is better suited to a XCD setup. I would love to use my 2017 model Scarpa F1 Boots as they are my go to slippers. This TTS style binding looks great, but wondering if my F1’s are compatible right off with no mods?


  6. Hiroki Ide
    Same situation like John M. Feit
    2 damage in the field. Good that I had a second set, away in the Alps
    So far, I’ve broken all the bindings I had, G3, BD, bulldog, except HammerHead and Outlow.
    I not used VOILE – so I have no opinion.
    Outlow I use 2 seasons, without problems.
    No more Meidjo, only steel from 22Designs 🙂

  7. Hiroki Ide, same sytuation like John M. Feit.
    Meidjo 2.0 – 2 damage in the field. It’s good that I had a second set away in the Alps.
    So far, I’ve broken all the bindings I had, G3, BD, bulldog, except HammerHead and Outlow.
    Outlow I use 2 seasons, I not used VOILE – so, no opinion.
    No more Meidjo, only steel from 22Designs 🙂

  8. Looks verry nice!! hope they will be built with already a long travel capacity. Something like the Outlaw X has and even more if possible, but not like the first version of the Outlaw cause it did’nt had much more travel than a Rotefella Freeride.

  9. So, what makes Lynx any better than Meidjo? Any detailed comparison between the two? (since they are the true comparable bindings)

    1. I love the way the Meidjo 2.0 skis. What I don’t love is the fact I have ripped two separate bindings out of two different skis, ruining both (Dynafit Huascarán and Atomic Backland 85). With new products, I expect some glitches. What is unacceptable, in my mind, is that those glitches destroy other components of my kit. No more Meidjo for me.

  10. Releasabilty is important to me off piste (done both ACLs over the years!). Never had the Rottefella release, even when I hit an unseen baby tree). The spring on M2 does release and is adjustable; not guaranteed of course, but comforting to me. So old, damaged folk like me would appreciate some form of (not guaranteed) release on the exciting looking Lynx!

  11. “Grey hair” comment: this is not the “ first composite flex plate” tele binding. Karhu 7 tm pioneered this concept, I think, and mine have had no problems for many 70 plus backcountry day -years, plus they RELEASE which is a boon skiing the tip-grabbing trees in these low-tide years. Ski Heil!

  12. Anyone able to comment on the mounting position (fore/aft) as compared to the outlaw x? Started mounting my skis with quiver killers and there is some overlap from my current binding (Ox) to what I hope to use with the Lynx. Thanks in advance!

  13. Disappointed that the linx prototype broke on me while testing at the Copper on-snow. Made for a really long run down when the plastic clip that allows you to “step in” snapped off…. Had high hopes, and looks like we’ll just have to be patient and wait for a revised version. Also, Not sure if you can compare the linx to the outlaw or Axl in terms of power…. it had a similar feel to the old G3 targa with the spring cartriges a little too loose… Tried all the different settings and cranking them down, but The binding never felt very active, and seem to rely on the flex of the boot. Got my fingers crossed the final version Will work as designed-

    1. Ah, didn’t hear that. Did hear that one binding wouldn’t hold in tour mode – because the plastic used for holding the claw in tour or turn positions was too soft (3D printer plastic – not known for long term durability). In theory better plastic will overcome that trouble.

      What boots were you using?

  14. I have two TTS rigs that have a ski brake. Using the ATK Freeraider 12 toe and TTS heel cable and pivot. Hagan US is importing the Freeraider 12 rebranded as the Hagan Core. The brakes retract and fold in to rest inboard of the edges. Pretty darn light.

  15. Excited for Nov 2018! Hopefully we will have a real winter next year too!

    Almost all AT bindings require turning the heel tower which is much more fiddley than simply clicking the claw in tour mode with your boot…looks pretty slick in the video!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.